Caribbean Regional - Political/Social/Economic Crime and Security Geopolitics U.S. Global Policies

Trump Presidency has Consequences for the Caribbean

Trump Presidency has Consequences for the Caribbean


Ambassador Curtis Ward

Ambassador Curtis A. Ward

(23 march 2017) — As a keen observer and analyst of American politics and government over the past several decades, I find the policies of the Donald Trump presidency so far to be disconcerting. Increased geopolitical uncertainty and instability across several regions now seem more probable than at any time in recent history.

American leadership generally, and its valuable financial contributions to international and regional organizations, such as the United Nations and the Organization of American States, as well as America’s financial support for the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank have served to facilitate global stability, and have contributed significantly to fostering democracy, rule of law, and economic development, including in Latin America and the Caribbean. A U.S. pull-back from a constructive leadership role in global affairs, including development assistance, will have unpredictable, long-term negative implications for world order.

The Trump administration FY2018 Budget, recently sent to the U.S. Congress clearly portends serious consequences for the Caribbean. The proposed cuts in the budgets of the U.S. State Department and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the significant cuts in U.S. contributions to the United Nations and the World Bank will significantly affect resources available through these institutions for the region. A reduction in USAID bilateral assistance will mean reduction or elimination of programs which are not deemed to be priorities for the Trump administration.  So far, there is no indication that the Caribbean region will be a priority, and levels of funding for security-related programs, and bilateral and regional economic and social development programs are likely to be cut.  There is nothing in the early policy prescriptions espoused by the Trump administration that leads to an optimistic conclusion.

Caribbean governments and their diplomatic representatives in Washington will have to be far more proactive than any in other period in the history of relations between the United States and the independent countries of the region.  Considerable efforts will be required to protect current bilateral and regional programs from being decimated. There are friends of the Caribbean in Congress who could be natural allies of the Caribbean, and the enactment of H.R. 4939 which was signed into law by President Barack Obama on December 16, 2016, provides a basis for the Caribbean to build sound relationships with the State Department and Congress and help frame future Trump administration policy towards the Caribbean. There is also an important role for the U.S.-based Caribbean diaspora and civic organizations in advocating for a favorable U.S.-Caribbean policy.

The detailed breakdown (line by line spending proposals) of the FY 2018 Budget has not yet been released bybudget-pic the Office of Management and Budget (The White House). So far what we have to go by is what is referred to as a Budget Blueprint (“America First – A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again”) which sets out the Trump administration’s proposed spending priorities. It provides us with a matrix of U.S. Government (USG) domestic and foreign spending priorities. There will be greater emphasis on projecting U.S. military strength abroad and less reliance on diplomatic initiatives to help stabilize global hot spots. President Trump’s policies are unpredictable and will create uncertainty as to whether the USG will act responsibly and with restraint within generally accepted international norms.

No one should be surprised with what could be a paradigm shift in U.S. foreign policy, even if such policy is incoherent at the moment. This shift in U.S. policy priorities reflect the bellicose rhetoric often heard during Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.  What is surprising is the level of cuts in Trump’s first Budget which will reduce significantly the capacity of the State Department to carry out its core mission.  Historically, American soft power has served America’s global interests best in times of peace. Thus this shift from soft power to projection of hard power is a policy doomed to failure; and there will be significant resistance in the U.S. Congress, even from a Republican Congress, as well as from the foreign policy community in Washington.  Even greater resistance from foreign friends and foes alike are expected.

As most of U.S. bilateral and regional programs are paid for out of the State Department/USAID’s budget, Caribbean governments have much about which to be concerned. The Trump administration’s FY 2018 Budget Blueprint slashes the State Department’s budget by about $14 billion, almost a 28% cut.  Such a reduction in resources will force the State Department to slash programs around the world, in particular programs in lower to middle income countries.  The Caribbean will see significant cuts in bilateral and regional programming.

It is an imperative for Caribbean governments to engage early with the State Department. There is a scramble underway to set its FY 2018 program priorities within the constraint of significantly reduced resources. The time to act is now! The Caribbean, comprising the U.S. “Third Border” can make a strong case for the USG to fund current programs going forward, in particular capacity-building programs related to security and law enforcement. Unfettered transnational criminal activities – drug trafficking, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering, human trafficking, and emerging radicalization and violent extremism in the region present security implications for the United States, as well as the Caribbean. Social intervention and economic programs are of equal significance in helping to reverse attraction to criminal activities by the youth population and to prevent violent extremism in some countries.

There is a strong case to be made that current programs maintain a virtual wall on the “third border” thus serving the mutual interests of the United States and the countries of the region.

Caribbean governments must be cognizant that the State Department’s budget submission to Congress is not a fait accompli. Changes will be made by members of Congress who will seek to fund or defund certain programs. Caribbean governments must knock on doors on the Hill. H.R. 4939, the “United States–Caribbean Strategic Engagement Act of 2016” provides an important vehicle for Caribbean governments to engage and make their cases to the State Department and the Congress. One of my future articles will explore further H.R. 4939.

Ambassador Curtis A. Ward

Please follow me on Facebook and Twitter

About the author

Ambassador Curtis A. Ward

Ambassador Curtis A. Ward is a former Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative of Jamaica to the United Nations with Special Responsibility for Security Council Affairs (1999-2002) serving on the UN Security Council for two years. He served three years as Expert Adviser to the UN Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee. He is an Attorney-at-Law and International Consultant with extensive knowledge and experience in national and international legal and policy frameworks for effective implementation of United Nations (UN) and other international anti-terrorism mandates; the legal and administrative requirements to effectively implement and enforce anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism (AML/CFT); extensive knowledge of the legal and regulatory requirements for effective implementation and enforcement of United Nations multilateral and U.S.-imposed unilateral sanctions; and the imperatives for Rule of Law and governance. He is a geopolitical and international security analyst, and a human rights, democracy, and anticorruption advocate.


  • Thank goodness we have an engaged ambassador and experienced diplomatic crew. That gives us 10%. I think the national security angle gives us the best chance to develop a strong working relationship with the administration. Thanks for your excellent insight

Leave a Comment